Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have faced accusations of employing a contentious method when naming their youngest child.

In a candid article for the Daily Mail, esteemed royal commentator Maureen Callahan sheds light on this matter.

The article delves into the strained family dynamics that have surfaced following the couple’s alleged decision to name their daughter Lilibet without obtaining the Queen’s approval.

“As if we needed further proof that Harry and Meghan hold nothing sacred — well, here it is.”

This is because, “We now know the rage that the late Queen Elizabeth is said to have felt when the Sussexes named their daughter Lilibet — the Queen’s nickname, used only by the very few closest to her.”

For those unversed, even commentator Rebecca English has found that the Queen was reported to have said, “I don’t own the palaces, I don’t own the paintings — the only thing I own is my name. And now they’ve taken that.”

In the eyes of Ms Callahan, “This is extraordinary” because “a woman who had been famous her entire life, who understood the media and took pride in never displaying her emotions in public, who exercised the greatest discretion even in private, was apparently so upset that she couldn’t restrain herself.”

“Perhaps the historian in her well knew: Her true feelings would eventually come out,” she later added.

After all, “Think about it: If Harry and Meghan had wished to honor the late Queen, surely they could have chosen ‘Elizabeth’ or any other derivation.”